Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES: WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. METHODS: We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination. RESULTS: We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Clinical Experience with Off-Label Intrathecal Administration of Selected Antibiotics in Adults: An Overview with Pharmacometric Considerations.

Drain-associated intracerebral infections are life-threatening emergencies. Their treatment is challenging due to the limited penetration of antibiotics to the site of infection, resulting in potentially inadequate exposure. The emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens might force the use of off-label intrathecal (IT) doses of antibiotics. We reviewed the literature on general aspects determining intrathecal dosing regimen, using pharmacometric knowledge. We summarised clinical experience with IT doses of antibiotics that are usually not used intrathecally, as well as the outcome of the cases and concentrations reached in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Factors determining the IT regimen are the size of the ventricle system and the CSF drainage volume. With regard to pharmacometrics, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices are likely similar to those in non-cerebral infections. The following number (N) of cases were described: benzylpenicillin (>50), ampicillin (1), ceftazidime (2), cephaloridine (56), ceftriaxone (1), cefotiam (1), meropenem (57), linezolid (1), tigecycline (15), rifampicin (3), levofloxacin (2), chloramphenicol (3) and daptomycin (8). Many side effects were reported for benzylpenicillin in the 1940-50s, but for the other antibiotics, when administered correctly, all side effects were minor and reversible. These data might help when choosing an IT dosing regimen in case there is no alternative option due to antimicrobial resistance.

Which patients benefit from model-informed precision dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin at the ICU?

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic dosing is not optimal in the ICU. Our recent trial investigated the effect of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin and showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes in all patients. This study aimed to identify subgroups of patients in which the MIPD of these antibiotics could be beneficial for clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analysed data from the DOLPHIN randomized controlled trial, which compared MIPD to standard dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in 388 ICU patients. We divided patients into subgroups based on baseline characteristics and assessed the effect of MIPD on 28-day mortality, 6-month mortality, change in sequential organ failure assessment (delta-SOFA), and ICU length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: We found a lower 28-day mortality in patients with a SOFA below 8 randomized to MIPD (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). However, patients with a higher SOFA show an increased 28-day mortality (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.07-3.59) in the MIPD group. ICU LOS was increased in patients receiving MIPD with a SOFA below 8 (IRR 1.36; 95% CI 1.01-1.83) and those receiving MIPD for ceftriaxone (IRR 1.76; 95% CI 1.24-2.51). Patients receiving a dose recommendation within 24 hours show a trend towards decreased ICU LOS (IRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.52-1.16) and higher delta-SOFA (estimate -1.19; 95% CI -2.98-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: ICU patients with a SOFA below 8 using MIPD had an increased ICU LOS but a lower 28-day mortality. Fast dose recommendations using MIPD of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin needs to be investigated in ICU patients.

Population plasma and urine pharmacokinetics and the probability of target attainment of fosfomycin in healthy male volunteers.

PURPOSE: A population pharmacokinetic model of fosfomycin was developed in healthy volunteers after intravenous administration, and different dosing regimens were evaluated in terms of the probability of target attainment for Escherichia coli using both plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. METHODS: Eight healthy men received fosfomycin as both intermittent 8 g q8h and continuous infusion 1 g/h with a loading dose of 8 g in a crossover study design. Dense sampling was conducted during both regimens. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens using bactericidal (AUC24h/MIC of 83 and 75%T>MIC) and bacteriostatic (AUC24h/MIC of 25) plasma targets and bacteriostatic (AUC24h/MIC of 3994) urine target. RESULTS: A total of 176 plasma and 86 urine samples were available for PK analysis. A two-compartment model with a urine compartment best described the data. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed a significant correlation with renal clearance and was implemented in the final model. Simulation results show that the dose of 4 g q8h reached 100% of PTA using bactericidal and bacteriostatic targets for MIC up to 16 mg/L. CONCLUSION: For the clinical breakpoint of 32 mg/L, the standard dosing regimen (4 g q8h) might not be sufficient to reach the bactericidal target. Higher dosing of 8 g q8h as an intermittent infusion or 0.75 g/h as a continuous infusion might be required. Continuous infusion resulted in better attainment of the %T>MIC target than intermittent infusion.

Meropenem Model-Informed Precision Dosing in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients: Can We Use It?

The number of pharmacokinetic (PK) models of meropenem is increasing. However, the daily role of these PK models in the clinic remains unclear, especially for critically ill patients. Therefore, we evaluated the published meropenem models on real-world ICU data to assess their suitability for use in clinical practice. All models were built in NONMEM and evaluated using prediction and simulation-based diagnostics for the ability to predict the subsequent meropenem concentrations without plasma concentrations (a priori), and with plasma concentrations (a posteriori), for use in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Eighteen PopPK models were included for evaluation. The a priori fit of the models, without the use of plasma concentrations, was poor, with a prediction error (PE)% of the interquartile range (IQR) exceeding the ±30% threshold. The fit improved when one to three concentrations were used to improve model predictions for TDM purposes. Two models were in the acceptable range with an IQR PE% within ±30%, when two or three concentrations were used. The role of PK models to determine the starting dose of meropenem in this population seems limited. However, certain models might be suitable for TDM-based dose adjustment using two to three plasma concentrations.

Plasma protein binding of ceftriaxone in critically ill patients: can we predict unbound fractions?

BACKGROUND: Standard antibiotic dosing is not suitable for critically ill patients, due to altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in these patients. Knowledge of protein binding is important for optimizing antibiotic exposure because only the unbound fraction is pharmacologically active. If unbound fractions can be predicted, minimal sampling techniques and less costly methods can be routinely used. METHODS: Data from the DOLPHIN trial, a prospective randomized clinical trial that included critically ill patients, were used. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were determined using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. A non-linear saturable binding model was made using 75% of the trough concentrations and validated on the remaining data. Our model and previously published models were tested for their performance for subtherapeutic (<1 mg/L) and high (>10 mg/L) unbound concentrations. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients were sampled [Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation version 4 (APACHE IV) score 71 (IQR 55-87), albumin 28 g/L (IQR 24-32)]. This resulted in 439 samples (trough = 224, peak = 215). Unbound fractions were significantly different between samples taken at trough and peak times [10.9% (IQR 7.9-16.4) versus 19.7% (IQR 12.9-26.6), P < 0.0001], which was not explained by concentration differences. Our model and most literature models showed good sensitivity and low specificity to determine high and subtherapeutic ceftriaxone trough concentrations using only the total ceftriaxone and albumin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone protein binding is not concentration related in critically ill patients. Existing models show good ability to predict high concentrations, but low specificity in predicting subtherapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacodynamics of Temocillin in Neutropenic Murine Infection Models.

Temocillin is used for the treatment of various infections caused by Enterobacterales. The pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) index that is best correlated with the activity of beta-lactams is the percentage of time that the unbound concentration exceeds the MIC (%fT>MIC). However, the %fT>MIC needed for a bacteriostatic or killing effect of temocillin is unknown in thigh and lung infection models. In the present study, we studied the temocillin PK in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of infected neutropenic mice and determined the plasma exposure-response relationships for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models were used. The bacterial loads in the thighs or lungs were determined. A sigmoid maximum-effect model was used to fit the plasma exposure-response relationship. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described temocillin PK (clearance [CL], 1.03 L/h/kg; volume of distribution [V], 0.457 L/kg). Protein binding was 78.2% ± 1.3% across different plasma concentrations. A static effect was achieved for all strains in both the thigh and lung infection models. However, the median %fT>MIC needed for a static effect was much lower in the lung infection model (27.8% for E. coli and 38.2% for K. pneumoniae) than in the thigh infection model (65.2% for E. coli and 64.9% for K. pneumoniae). A 1-log kill was reached for all strains in the lung infection model (median %fT>MIC values of 42.1% for E. coli and 44.1% for K. pneumoniae) and 7 out of 8 strains in the thigh infection model (median %fT>MIC values of 85.4% for E. coli and 74.5% for K. pneumoniae). These data support the use of temocillin in patients with pneumonia.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of polymyxin B in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae murine infection models.

BACKGROUND: Although polymyxin B has been in use since the late 1950s, there have been limited studies done to unravel its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) index. METHODS: We determined, in neutropenic infected mice, the PK, plasma protein binding and PK/PD index best correlating with efficacy for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profile showed non-linear PK; dose was significantly correlated with absorption rate and clearance. The inhibitory sigmoid dose-effect model for the fCmax/MIC index of E. coli fitted best, but was only modestly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC (R2 0.91-0.93). For K. pneumoniae the fAUC/MIC index had the best fit, which was slightly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fCmax/MIC (R2 0.85-0.91). Static targets of polymyxin B fAUC/MIC were 27.5-102.6 (median 63.5) and 5.9-60.5 (median 11.6) in E. coli and in K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. A 1 log kill effect was only reached in two E. coli isolates and one K. pneumoniae. The PTA with the standard dosing was low for isolates with MIC >0.25 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that fAUC/MIC can describe the exposure-response relationship for polymyxin B. The 1 log kill effect was achieved in the minority of the isolates whereas polymyxin B PK/PD targets cannot be attained for the majority of clinical isolates with the standard dosing regimen, indicating that polymyxin B may be not effective against serious infections as monotherapy.

Dose optimization of cefotaxime as pre-emptive treatment in critically ill adult patients: A population pharmacokinetic study.

AIMS: To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cefotaxime as pre-emptive treatment in critically ill adult patients, including covariates and to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) of different dosage regimens for Enterobacterales and Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Five samples were drawn during 1 dosage interval in critically ill patients treated with cefotaxime 1 g q6h or q4h. PK parameters were estimated using NONMEM (v7.4.2). The percentage of patients reaching 100% fT>MICECOFF was used to compare different dosage regimens for Enterobacterales and S. aureus. RESULTS: This study included 92 patients (437 samples). The best structural model was a 2-compartment model with a combined error, interindividual variability on clearance, central volume and intercompartmental clearance. Correlations between interindividual variability were included. Clearance increased with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; creatinine clearance) and albumin concentration. For Enterobacterales, 1 g q8h reached 95% PTA and continuous infusion (CI) of 4 g 24 h-1 100% PTA at the highest eGFR and albumin concentration. For S. aureus the predefined target of 95% PTA was not reached with higher eGFR and/or albumin concentrations. CI of 6 g 24 h-1 for S. aureus resulted in a minimum of 99% PTA. CONCLUSION: Cefotaxime PK in critically ill patients was best described by a 2-compartment model with eGFR and albumin concentration as covariates influencing clearance. For Enterobacterales 1 g q8h or CI of 4 g 24 h-1 was adequate for all combinations of eGFR and albumin concentration. For S. aureus CI of 6 g 24 h-1 would be preferred if eGFR and albumin concentration exceed 80 mL min-1 and 40 g L-1 respectively.

Model-informed precision dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients: a multicentre randomised clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Individualising drug dosing using model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin has been proposed as an alternative to standard dosing to optimise antibiotic efficacy in critically ill patients. However, randomised clinical trials (RCT) on clinical outcomes have been lacking. METHODS: This multicentre RCT, including patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who were treated with antibiotics, was conducted in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomised to MIPD with dose and interval adjustments based on monitoring serum drug levels (therapeutic drug monitoring) combined with pharmacometric modelling of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, 6-month mortality, delta sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, adverse events and target attainment. RESULTS: In total, 388 (MIPD n = 189; standard dosing n = 199) patients were analysed (median age 64 [IQR 55-71]). We found no significant differences in ICU LOS between MIPD compared to standard dosing (10 MIPD vs 8 standard dosing; IRR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.96-1.41; p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in target attainment before intervention at day 1 (T1) (55.6% MIPD vs 60.9% standard dosing; p = 0.24) or at day 3 (T3) (59.5% vs 60.4%; p = 0.84). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We could not show a beneficial effect of MIPD of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin on ICU LOS in critically ill patients. Our data highlight the need to identify other approaches to dose optimisation.

Cefepime pharmacodynamic targets against Enterobacterales employing neutropenic murine lung infection and in vitro pharmacokinetic models.

BACKGROUND: Very limited studies, so far, have been conducted to identify the pharmacodynamic targets of cefepime, a well-established fourth-generation cephalosporin. As a result, conventional targets representing the cephalosporin class are used for cefepime target attainment analysis. OBJECTIVES: We employed both a neutropenic murine lung infection model and an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM) to determine cefepime's pharmacodynamic target [percentage of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain higher than the MIC (%fT>MIC)] for bacteriostatic and 1 log10 kill effects. METHODS: Ten strains with cefepime MICs ranging from 0.03 to 16 mg/L were studied in the lung infection. In the IVPM, five cefepime-resistant strains with cefepime/tazobactam (fixed 8 mg/L) MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L were included. Through 24 h dose fractionation, both in lung infection and IVPM (in the latter case, tazobactam 8 mg/L continuous infusion was used to protect cefepime), varying cefepime exposures and corresponding pharmacodynamic effect scenarios were generated to identify the pharmacodynamic targets. RESULTS: Using a non-linear sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model, the cefepime's plasma fT>MIC for 1 log10 kill in lung infection ranged from 17% to 53.7% and a combined exposure-response plot yielded 30%. In the case of IVPM, T>MIC ranged from 6.9% to 75.4% with a mean value of 34.2% for 1 log10 kill. CONCLUSIONS: Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirements are lower than generally reported for cephalosporins (50%-70% fT>MIC). The lower requirement for cefepime could be linked with factors such as cefepime's better permeation properties and multiple PBP affinity-driven enhanced bactericidal action.

The mysteries of target site concentrations of antibiotics in bone and joint infections: what is known? A narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, antibiotic treatment is often a standard dosing regimen in bone and joint infections (BJI). However, it remains unknown if exposure at the target-site is adequate. The aim of this review is to gain more insight in the relationship between the target site concentration of antibiotic and the minimal inhibitory concentration to target the bacteria in bone and joint infections (BJI). AREAS COVERED: A literature search was performed by Erasmus MC Medical library. Bone, bone tissue and synovial concentration of antibiotics were covered in humans. In addition, we reported number of patients, dose, sampling method, analytical method and tissue and plasma concentrations. We used the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) values of the targeted micro-organisms. If more than 3 publications were available on the antibiotic, we graphically presented ECOFFS values against reported antibiotic concentrations. EXPERT OPINION: For most antibiotics, the literature is sparse. In addition, a lot of variable and total antibiotic concentrations are published. Ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, vancomycin and linezolid seem to have adequate average exposure if correlating total concentration to ECOFF, when standard dosing is used. With regard to other antibiotics, results are inconclusive. More extensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in BJI is needed.

Pharmacodynamics of Flucloxacillin in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model: A Piece of the Puzzle towards Evidence-Based Dosing.

For decades, flucloxacillin has been used to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Little is still known about its pharmacodynamics (PD). The present study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD index and the PD-index value minimally required for efficacy. MICs of 305 MSSA isolates were measured to determine the wild-type distribution. The PD of 8 S. aureus, 1 S. pyogenes, and 1 S. agalactiae isolates were evaluated in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Two S. aureus isolates were used in a dose-fractionation study and a dose−response analysis was performed additionally in the in vivo model. Data were analyzed with a population PK and sigmoid maximum effect model. The end of the wild-type distribution was 1 mg/L. The percentage of time the unbound concentration was above MIC (%fT > MIC) was best correlated with efficacy. For S. aureus, median %fT > 0.25 × MIC required for 1-log reduction was 15%. The value for S. pyogenes was 10%fT > MIC and for S. agalactiae 22%fT > 0.25xMIC for a 1-log reduction. The effect of flucloxacillin reached a 2-log reduction of S. aureus at 20%fT > 0.25xMIC and also for S. pyogenes and S. agalactiae, a reduction was reached. These data may serve to optimize dosing regimens currently used in humans.

Binding of temocillin to plasma proteins in vitro and in vivo: the importance of plasma protein levels in different populations and of co-medications.

BACKGROUND: Temocillin plasma protein binding (PPB) in healthy individuals is reported to be ∼85% but had not been studied in patients. OBJECTIVES: To obtain normative data on temocillin PPB in patients in relation to infection and impact of co-medications widely used in ICU. METHODS: Plasma was obtained from healthy individuals (Group #1), non-ICU patients with UTI (Group #2), ICU patients with suspected/confirmed ventriculitis (Group #3) or with sepsis/septic shock (Group #4). Total and unbound temocillin concentrations were measured in spiked samples from temocillin-naive donors (in vitro) or in plasma from temocillin-treated subjects (in vivo). The impact of diluting plasma, using pharmaceutical albumin, or adding drugs potentially competing for PPB was tested in spiked samples. Data were analysed using a modified Hill-Langmuir equation taking ligand depletion into account. RESULTS: Temocillin PPB was saturable in all groups, both in vitro and in vivo. Maximal binding capacity (Bmax) was 1.2-2-fold lower in patients. At 20 and 200 mg/L (total concentrations), the unbound fraction reached 12%-29%, 23%-42% and 32%-52% in Groups #2, #3, #4. The unbound fraction was inversely correlated with albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Binding to albumin was 2-3-fold lower than in plasma and non-saturable. Drugs with high PPB but active at lower molar concentrations than temocillin caused minimal displacement, while fluconazole (low PPB but similar plasma concentrations to temocillin) increased up to 2-fold its unbound fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Temocillin PPB is saturable, 2-4-fold lowered in infected patients in relation to disease severity (ICU admission, hypoalbuminaemia, inflammation) and only partially reproducible with albumin. Competition with other drugs must be considered for therapeutic concentrations to be meaningful.

Barriers and facilitators for therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that failure of achieving pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used antibiotics is common in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can contribute to optimize the exposure of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin. While evidence for TDM of these antibiotics is growing, translation into clinical implementation remains limited. Therefore, perceived barriers and facilitators are important for implementing TDM in this population. The primary aim of this study was to identify healthcare professionals' barriers and facilitators for the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in Dutch intensive care units (ICU). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional online survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in antibiotic treatment of ICU patients. An adapted version of the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations was sent out. Items were considered barriers when ≥ 20% of participants responded with a negative answer. If ≥ 80% of the participants responded with a positive answer, the item was considered a facilitator. RESULTS: Sixty-four HCPs completed the survey, of which 14 were from academic hospitals, 25 from general hospitals, and 25 from teaching hospitals. Most participants were hospital pharmacists (59%) or medical specialists (23%). Eleven barriers and four facilitators for implementation of TDM of beta-lactams were identified; 17 barriers for TDM of ciprofloxacin and no facilitators. The most important barriers were a lack of conclusive evidence, organizational support, and low availability of assays. Additional barriers were a lack of consensus on which specific patients to apply TDM and which pharmacodynamic targets to use. Identified facilitators for beta-lactam TDM implementation are low complexity and high task perception, combined with the perception that TDM is important to prevent side effects and to adequately treat infections. Twenty-eight percent of participants reported that flucloxacillin could be analyzed in their hospital. Assay availability of other beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin was lower (3-17%). CONCLUSION: Several barriers were identified that could obstruct the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU. In particular, education, clear guidelines, and organizational support should be considered when creating tailored implementation strategies. Finally, evidence of beneficial clinical outcomes on TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin can enhance further implementation.

Pharmacokinetics of Clavulanic Acid in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clavulanic acid is a commonly used ß-lactam inhibitor in pediatrics for a variety of infections. Clear insight into its mode of action is lacking, however, and a target has not been identified. The dosing of clavulanic acid is currently based on that of the partner drug (amoxicillin or ticarcillin). Still, proper dosing of the compound is needed because clavulanic acid has been associated with adverse effects. In this systematic review, we aim to describe the current literature on the pharmacokinetics of clavulanic acid in the pediatric population METHODS: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase.com, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. We included all published studies reporting pharmacokinetic data on clavulanic acid in neonates and children 0-18 years of age. RESULTS: The search resulted in 18 original studies that met the inclusion criteria. In general, the variation in drug exposure was large, which can be partly explained by differences in disease state, route of administration, or age. Unfortunately, the studies' limited background information hampered in-depth assessment of the observed variability. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of clavulanic acid in pediatric patients is highly variable, similar to reports in adults, but more pronounced. Significant knowledge gaps remain with regard to the population-specific explanation for this variability. Model-based pharmacokinetic studies that address both maturational and disease-specific changes in the pediatric population are therefore needed. Furthermore, additional pharmacodynamic studies are needed to define a clear target. The combined outcomes will eventually lead to pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of clavulanic acid and targeted exposure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020137253.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: Current Practice and Future Perspectives With a Focus on Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: Early initiation of antibiotics is essential for ameliorating infections in critically ill patients. The correct dosage of antibiotics is imperative to ensure their adequate exposure. Critically ill patients have altered pharmacokinetic parameters and are often infected by less susceptible microorganisms. Differences in drug disposition are not considered with standard doses of antibiotics. This can lead to suboptimal antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients. To overcome this problem of suboptimal dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy commonly used to support individualized dosing of antibiotics. It is routinely used for vancomycin and aminoglycosides in clinical practice. In recent years, it has become apparent that TDM may also be used in other antibiotics. METHODS: This review summarizes the evidence for TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, focuses on clinical outcomes, and summarizes possibilities for optimized TDM in the future. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After reviewing the literature, we can conclude that general TDM implementation is advised for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides, as evidence of the relationship between TDM and clinical outcome is present. For antibiotics, such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and linezolid, it seems rational to perform TDM in specific patient cases. TDM involving other antibiotics is supported by individual cases, specifically to decrease toxicity. When focusing on future possibilities to improve TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, implementation of model-informed precision dosing should be investigated because it can potentially streamline the TDM process. The logistics of TDM, such as turnaround time and available equipment, are challenging but may be overcome by rapid bioanalytical techniques or real-time monitoring of drug concentrations through biosensors in the future. Education, clinical information on targets, and clinical outcome studies are other important factors that facilitate TDM implementation.

Barriers and Facilitators in the Clinical Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Critical Review.

BACKGROUND: With increasing knowledge of beta-lactam pharmacodynamics and interpatient and intrapatient variability in pharmacokinetics, the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is becoming increasingly clear. However, little research has been conducted to identify potential barriers and facilitators in the clinical implementation of beta-lactam TDM. This study provides an overview of the current practices of beta-lactam TDM and barriers and facilitators in its implementation. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE database in April 2021, without restrictions on the publication date. All studies reporting the implementation of beta-lactam antibiotic TDM in critically ill patients through questionnaires or surveys were included in this review. RESULTS: Six eligible studies were identified from 215 records, all of which were cross-sectional. All studies identified barriers and facilitators in the implementation of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients. The main barriers were insufficient knowledge about various aspects regarding the implementation of beta-lactam TDM and the unavailability of assays. Furthermore, a delay in the acquisition of TDM results reduces the probability of physicians altering drug dosages. Finally, doubts about the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients hinder broad implementation. Moreover, to improve the willingness of physicians to use beta-lactam TDM, collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists and clinical microbiologists should be strengthened. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence for application of beta-lactam TDM continues to grow, its clinical implementation remains limited. To enable optimal implementation of these antibiotics in critically ill patients, several barriers need to be overcome regarding logistics, equipment availability, clinical evidence, and proof of cost-effectiveness.

Health Care Costs of Target Attainment for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the EXPAT Study.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing beta-lactam antibiotic treatment is a promising method to reduce the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and therefore reduce ICU costs. We used data from the EXPAT trial to determine whether beta-lactam antibiotic target attainment is a cost determinant in the ICU. METHODS: Patients included in the EXPAT trial were divided into target attainment and target nonattainment based on serum antibiotic levels. All hospital costs were extracted from the hospital administration system and categorized. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients were included in the analysis. Target attainment showed a trend toward higher total ICU costs (€44,600 versus €28,200, P = 0.103). This trend disappeared when correcting for ICU length of stay (€2680 versus €2700). Renal replacement therapy was the most important cost driver. CONCLUSIONS: Target attainment for beta-lactam antibiotics shows a trend toward higher total costs in ICU patients, which can be attributed to the high costs of a long stay in the ICU and renal replacement therapy.